A professor at a private college in Minnesota has been dismissed from her job for showing students a 14th-century image of the Islamic prophet Muhammad during an art history course.
The instructor, Erika LĂłpez Prater, had been an adjunct professor at Hamline University in St. Paul. Prater, aware that images of Muhammad are considered offensive by many Muslims, took steps to ensure that her students knew the image (as well of those of other religious figures) would be included. She put the information in a course syllabus and offered to accommodate students who would prefer not to see it. She also included a warning to the class the day the image was used.
Nevertheless, a student complained, and Prater was let go by officials at the school.
The Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) supported the student and argued that inclusion of the image was offensive. But last week, CAIRâs national office in Washington, D.C., overruled the local chapter and issued a statement opposing the universityâs action.
The national CAIR office called for schools to be sensitive to the needs of Muslim students but added that in this case, the professor was engaging in legitimate academic instruction; thereâs no evidence, CAIR noted, that she was motivated by Islamophobia.
âAlthough we strongly discourage showing visual depictions of the Prophet, we recognize that professors who analyze ancient paintings for an academic purpose are not the same as Islamophobes who show such images to cause offense,â CAIRâs statement read. âBased on what we know up to this point, we see no evidence that Professor Erika LĂłpez Prater acted with Islamophobic intent or engaged in conduct that meets our definition of Islamophobia. ⊠Academics should not be condemned as bigots without evidence or lose their positions without justification.â
CAIR urged officials at Hamline to find a way to ârespect the sincerely held religious beliefs of students, treat faculty members fairly and protect academic freedom, all at the same time.â
Alas, officials at Hamline donât seem interested in doing that. Despite a growing chorus of criticism from free-speech groups and academic-freedom advocates, they have doubled down and say they wonât reinstate Prater.
Thatâs unfortunate. Prater used the image for academic purposes. She never intended to insult any faith, and she took several steps to ensure that no student would be shown images offensive to them against their will.
Allowing religion-based objections to shut down certain forms of instruction is antithetical to the goals of higher education. Prater did nothing wrong. She deserves to get her job back.
Photo: University Hall-Old Main, Hamline University
