Marouf v. Beccera

Last modified 2022.04.28


  • Status Ongoing
  • Type Counsel
  • Court U.S. District Court
  • Issues Discrimination in Name of Religion, Discrimination in Social Services, Foster Care Discrimination, LGBTQ Rights, Religious and Racial Equality, Taxpayer Funding of Religion

Fatma Marouf and Bryn Esplin are a married couple who live in Fort Worth, Texas. Fatma teaches at Texas A&M School of Law and Bryn at the University of North Texas Health Science Center. The couple had long wanted to have children. They realized that they wanted to provide a home for an unaccompanied refugee child in 2017, after Fatma, through her work with her immigration clinic, connected with the head of Catholic Charities Fort Worth. Catholic Charities is a sub-grantee of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which receives federal funds to provide shelter and assist with the placement of children in its custody.

Fatma and Bryn began exchanging emails with Catholic Charities about the next steps toward becoming a foster family. But during a phone interview, a representative mentioned that foster families must “mirror the Holy Family.” When the couple asked for clarification (and explained that they were a married same-sex couple), the Catholic Charities representative declared that they did not “qualify” to foster a refugee child through the taxpayer-funded program it operates for the federal government—simply because of their sexual orientation. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and its subsidiaries apply their own religious criteria in administering the federal government’s refugee foster-care programs.

Fatma and Bryn, represented by Americans United, Lambda Legal, and the private law firm Hogan Lovells, sued the Office of Refugee Resettlement of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for supporting unlawful discrimination by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in administering and operating the placement of refugee children on the government’s behalf. It violates the Establishment Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution to fund and enable discrimination based on religious criteria against potential foster parents who would participate in the federal refugee resettlement program. When the government subsidizes the Bishops’ religion-based discrimination, it inflicts harm not only on prospective foster parents, but also on the refugee children whom the government deprives of opportunities to be placed in loving homes.

As a result of our lawsuit, the federal government has made changes to the refugee-children programs in the Dallas-Fort Worth region of Texas. The Court has given the plaintiffs an opportunity to discover information about these changes and whether they affect the case. The Court further instructed the parties to file papers in June and July advising the Court of their respective positions as to how the case should be resolved.

BREAKING:

The Supreme Court just gutted decades of precedent by stripping away public school students’ religious freedom rights.

This is the greatest loss of religious freedom in generations. Help us fight back!

DONATE NOW