MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger v. Department of Health and Human Services

Last modified 2022.09.30

  • Status Ongoing
  • Type Counsel
  • Court U.S. District Court
  • Issues Discrimination in Name of Religion, Discrimination in Social Services, Nontheist, Atheist, Humanist, Religious and Racial Equality, Taxpayer Funding of Religion

Case Documents

Shortly before leaving office, the Trump administration enacted regulations that greatly weakened protections for religious minorities and nonbelievers who receive federally funded social services through religious organizations. Under previous regulations, enacted by the Obama administration after lengthy negotiations that included faith-based organizations, beneficiaries of federal social-service programs were entitled to notice of their rights not to be religiously proselytized or coerced. Beneficiaries were also entitled to referral to an alternative provider if they objected to a provider’s religious nature. The Trump administration’s last-minute regulations eliminated these protections. The Trump regulations also allow religious service providers that are funded with vouchers to require beneficiaries to attend religious activities in order to receive benefits.

On January 19, 2021, together with our co-counsel Democracy Forward and Lambda Legal, we filed a lawsuit challenging the new regulations: MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger v. HHS. We have sued the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services, Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, Veterans Affairs, Education, Homeland Security, Justice, and Labor. We contend that these agencies violated the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, a federal law that mandates that rulemaking agencies engage in reasoned decision-making. We argue that the agencies did not give good reasons for the rule change, failed to consider the benefits of the old regulations, failed to consider the harms the new regulations will inflict on vulnerable communities, relied on internally inconsistent reasoning, failed to consider alternatives to the new regulations, and failed to act consistently with an applicable executive order. The rule is thus “arbitrary and capricious” and should be vacated.

In October 2021, after the Biden administration announced that it is considering potential changes to the challenged regulations, we agreed to temporarily pause the case until May 6, 2022. We subsequently agreed to extend the stay to September 30, 2022, and then to December 16, 2022.


As Supreme Court Entertains Attack On Civil Rights Laws In 303 Creative, Americans United Reminds Nation Of What’s At Stake

Americans United for Separation of Church and State joined 29 religious freedom organizations in filing an amicus brief that explained how anti-discrimination laws like Colorado’s protect religious minorities as well as LGBTQ people and customers with other protected characteristics, such as race, sex, age and ability.

Read More