Emilee Carpenter, LLC v. James

Last modified 2022.10.03

  • Status Ongoing
  • Type Amicus
  • Court U.S. Court of Appeals, U.S. District Court
  • Issues Discrimination by Businesses, Discrimination in Name of Religion, LGBTQ Rights, Religious and Racial Equality, Why People of Faith Support Church-State Separation

Case Documents

Like many states, New York prohibits public accommodations—businesses that provide goods and services to the general public—from discriminating based on a variety of protected characteristics, including sexual orientation. Emilee Carpenter, a photographer in southern New York, objects to marriages between same-sex couples on religious grounds. In April 2021, seeking to discriminate openly against same-sex couples who need wedding photography, Carpenter filed a lawsuit challenging New York’s antidiscrimination law.

The state filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit in June 2021, and Americans United filed an amicus brief in support of the state. In December 2021, the district court ruled in favor of the state and dismissed the lawsuit. The court explained that Carpenter’s freedom-of-religion arguments lacked merit because New York’s antidiscrimination law does not target religious objectors but instead prohibits all sexual-orientation discrimination in public accommodations.

Carpenter appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In May 2022, Americans United once again filed an amicus brief supporting the state, arguing that the right to freely exercise religion does not give Carpenter an entitlement to discriminate based on sexual orientation, that New York’s law does not coerce Carpenter into participating in religious activities, and that laws prohibiting discrimination by public accommodations are vital to ensuring religious freedom for all. If public accommodations were free to discriminate on religious grounds, countless New Yorkers could be turned away by photographers, bakers, restaurants, and more simply for being the “wrong” religion. Such a result would stifle religious freedom, not support it.

Carpenter’s appeal is currently stayed until the Supreme Court decides a similar pending case, 303 Creative v. Elenis.


Americans United & the National Women’s Law Center file suit to challenge Missouri’s abortion bans.

Abortion bans violate the separation of church and state. Americans United and the National Women’s Law Center—the leading experts in religious freedom and gender justice—have joined forces with thirteen clergy from six faith traditions to challenge Missouri’s abortion bans as unconstitutionally imposing one narrow religious doctrine on everyone.

Join the Fight and Donate Today